tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5076215.post1309134647506735831..comments2007-12-03T21:47:08.577ZVilashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02357470670513635329noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5076215.post-20055831159223167762007-12-03T21:47:00.000Z2007-12-03T21:47:00.000Z

Agreed. This story is about outright malafide intent. But there are usage intent which appear legit, but cause havoc for supplier. In normal enterprise IT , this would be your worst case capacity problem. Occurs only when you hit a demand spike, you just take it on chin and bear it. But in 2.0 world it may happen frequently and cause more problems. A IT solution to handle this would be a

Vilashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02357470670513635329noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5076215.post-3486321454891233732007-11-30T21:56:00.000Z2007-11-30T21:56:00.000Z

Great story Vilas. It also demonstrates the need for a formal contract between service consumer and service provider that is more than just the functional interface, but instead includes information on expected/allowed usage, for example. Interestingly, in these B2B scenarios, there should be a direct relationship between the legal contract that governs the relationship between supplier and

biskehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03066865865923371644noreply@blogger.com